Amedeo Modigliani, Nu couché, 1919 © Marc Restellini/Institut Restellini Essays Inside the Making of the Landmark Modigliani Catalogue Raisonné Marc Glimcher and Marc Restellini in Conversation Published Thursday, Mar 19, 2026 On the occasion of the publication of his six-volume Amedeo Modigliani catalogue raisonné, art historian Marc Restellini joined Marc Glimcher, CEO of Pace Gallery, for a conversation about new directions for research and methodologies in the making of catalogues raisonnés.On April 30, Pace Gallery in New York will host a day-long symposium centering on new ways of thinking about how these publications can be produced and utilized, offering perspectives and insights from scholars and experts in several fields. Next year, Pace will present a major exhibition of Modigliani’s work, organized in collaboration with the Institut Restellini, in New York.The conversation that follows has been edited and condensed. Read More Marc Restellini:My background with Modigliani goes back many years. I was born into a family that knew Léopold Zborowski, Modigliani’s dealer and my grandfather’s dealer. My grandfather, Isaac Antcher, was a painter of the School of Paris. He never knew Modigliani, but he was very close with Jonas Netter, who collected my grandfather’s work and was also one of the biggest collectors of Modigliani in history—he had around 60 paintings by Modigliani. The friendship between the Antcher and Netter families has persisted for three generations, and I have remained extremely close to the Netter descendants. Currently, I’m the curator of the Netter collection, structured as a foundation, which is also the largest collection of Isaac Antcher’s paintings.My first physical contact with Modigliani occurred when I was six or seven years old in Netter’s house. I touched a painting, and I remember my mother told me, “Don’t touch! It’s very expensive.” I was shy and didn’t understand what the work was. Years later, when I was studying at the Sorbonne University, I had a professor who knew my family’s background and encouraged me to study Modern art and the School of Paris. This was complicated because, to me, a historian needs to be objective and can’t have this kind of family interest. I was fixated on this problem, and for a long time it felt impossible. But ultimately, I began my research on the School of Paris at university, and I wrote my master’s thesis specifically on Zborowski and the painters he collected.I organized my first exhibition of works by Modigliani, Chaim Soutine, and my grandfather in 1989. A few years later, in 1992, I made an exhibition of more than 55 paintings by Modigliani at the Tobu Museum in Japan. This was when I really started my work with Modigliani.When I pursued my PhD in the 1990s, I started using the computer for art historical research. I got a microcomputer with dBase III and created a database and methodology that could support the production of a catalogue raisonné. I was hired to work on uniting computers, research, and art history as a lecturer at the Sorbonne.Marc Glimcher:It’s very hard for people to understand the role of technology and the way we thought about art and research back in the 1990s. In 1994, Pace got dBase III as well, and we started to design a system to hold the inventory and history of the gallery. Now it seems like crude, old technology, but at the time it was the beginning of the basic ideas of scientific methodology for humanities research. It felt like the first possibility of objective truth coming into our world, which was very radical. Before then, truth was defined by people—this expert or that expert, this opinion or that opinion. Computers challenged that. It's amazing to hear about how technology shaped your research and your work with Modigliani. Can you speak more about the beginnings of your work on the catalogue raisonné?MR: I was put in contact with Daniel Wildenstein, the dealer and art historian, in the mid-1990s and he encouraged me a lot to start the catalogue raisonné. He suggested that I use his Institute as a workspace and as support to the project. He knew all about the Modigliani exhibition I had organized in Japan and my strong connection with the Netter family. I was a little reluctant because I knew how difficult it would be—I wanted to create a catalogue raisonné with the least outside intervention, the least subjectivity, as possible. Only with facts, information, and scientific results. I wanted to remove and erase the expert, which was a real paradox at that time.I started working on provenance, style, and scientific analysis. I asked Daniel Wildenstein to invest in an infrared camera and tools for pigment analysis, and he agreed. We used a control group of pigment samples from paintings in major Modigliani collections—including that of Jonas Netter and Paul Alexandre, who were two of the earliest collectors of the artist’s work.I created a methodology based on three pillars: scientific analysis, stylistic comparisons, and provenance research. With this documentation, we decided whether a painting would be included in the catalogue raisonné or not.MG: That’s an amazing story. I think it’s worth noting a few of these points that are essential not only to the historical record and legacy of Modigliani but also to the future of art historical research. It’s interesting that this idea of eliminating the expert, eliminating subjectivity, is so recent in our world. It’s a very new idea, but, of course, it’s an idea from the Enlightenment. And then, centuries later, we get the principle of the null hypothesis—we make a hypothesis and then we attempt to disprove it.We’re now seeing this penetrate the world of catalogues raisonnés. By and large, catalogues raisonnés include essays about artists and some brief conversation about the making of the publication, but they are essentially tantamount to scientific journal papers with no methodology section, which would never be accepted in any other field. We have catalogue raisonné after catalogue raisonné that present us with a set of facts that we are to take as truth, but with no methodology. It gets lost in a kind of tradition instead of an analysis, or an adherence to the null hypothesis. That’s not how we do science, nor how we do rigorous humanities research. For this to be acceptable, there must be results, and there must be a conclusion that can be tested and verified.Could you talk a little bit about how you came to the decision to create volume one of this book, which gives a full explanation of your methodology? Read More By and large, catalogues raisonnés include essays about artists and some brief conversation about the making of the publication, but they are essentially tantamount to scientific journal papers with no methodology section, which would never be accepted in any other field. Marc Glimcher MR: Volume one contains all the information from and documentation of our process, as well as stylistic comparisons and scientific analyses. In this volume, we created a template, a scheme, explaining how we used these methods to arrive at our conclusions. The subject of pigment, to take only one example, is extremely complicated—it’s about compatibility with a specific period but also with the artist’s technique, and that can only be obtained if you have enough information and data for each painting.MG: This is really a milestone in the history of catalogues raisonnés, and this is something we have been involved with at Pace since the 1990s, when technology was starting to creep into the art world. Digital technology and the emergence of the very early internet suggested to us at Pace that catalogues raisonnés could be living things that would allow dynamic historical recording. We started imagining a digital catalogue raisonné system that would allow the data to be live.We founded Artifex Press, which is now part of the Cahiers d'Art Institute. We’ve always been interested in how the facts and information that travel with artworks would evolve. When we first learned about your publication coming to completion, we immediately recognized it as a major evolutionary turning point for the catalogue raisonné as an idea.You’ve not only been working on Modigliani your whole life, but you’ve also been in and around the community of researchers making catalogues raisonnés for the last thirty years. What are some of the key moments of change you’ve seen, and what does this book mean for the ways that catalogues raisonnés will be produced in the future? Read More It’s taken many years for everyone to acknowledge that scientific analysis is very important. If future catalogues raisonnés use what I did as a reference point, I think the market will be much safer. Marc Restellini MR: That’s a big question. I’ve seen a lot of evolution over the last thirty years. When I started with scientific analysis, everyone in the market laughed. My nickname was “X-man,” and everyone called me crazy. “Why do you want to use this? We don’t need that,” they said. It’s taken many years for everyone to acknowledge that scientific analysis is very important. If future catalogues raisonnés use what I did as a reference point, I think the market will be much safer.MG: It all rests on having authority created by methodology rather than authority created by someone’s position or tradition, or by some kind of subjective consensus. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, there was a rising fear of inauthentic works. A demand for absolute reference points in artists’ bodies of work started to surge, and no such reference point existed for Modigliani. The market reverted to Ambrogio Ceroni’s catalogue raisonné, which was produced between 1958 and 1970. Ceroni’s book is woefully incomplete; it’s missing some of Modigliani’s most famous paintings—many, many paintings that have been known for a long time.So, the purpose of our 2027 exhibition of Modigliani’s work in New York is to highlight the publication of this new catalogue raisonné and all your research over these past three decades. The show will, by necessity, feature many paintings that are not in Ceroni’s publication. It’s going to highlight this expansion of knowledge about Modigliani’s legacy—we’re hoping to show some paintings that haven’t been exhibited in many years.MR: My dream is to show the paintings alongside scientific materials that we used in our research and to explain some of Modigliani’s stylistic techniques. It would be very interesting to offer a new perspective on all these aspects of Modigliani in the exhibition, inviting visitors to discover something new. Read More Join us for A Symposium Celebrating the Release of the Landmark Amedeo Modigliani Catalogue Raisonné by Institut RestelliniPace Gallery, 540 West 25th Street, 7th floorThursday, April 30, 2026 | 9:30am-5pm Read More News Pace Will Mount Major Amedeo Modigliani Exhibition in New York in Multi-Part Collaboration with Institut Restellini Oct 14, 2025 Films Marc Glimcher on Maysha Mohamedi’s New Works Mar 18, 2026 News Anicka Yi Joins Pace Gallery Mar 03, 2026 Exhibitions Our Artists in Venice 2026 Feb 25, 2026 Essays — Inside the Making of the Landmark Modigliani Catalogue Raisonné,